Legislature(2013 - 2014)
2014-04-07 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2014-04-07 Senate Journal Page 2302 HB 266 SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 266(FIN) "An Act making appropriations for the operating and loan program expenses of state government and for certain programs, capitalizing funds, and making reappropriations; and providing for an effective date" was before the Senate in second reading. Senator French offered Amendment No. 3 : Page 29, line 13: Delete "11,052,200" Insert "11,177,200" Delete "4,680,100" Insert "4,555,100" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Senator French moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 3. Senator Coghill objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Ellis, French, Gardner, Wielechowski Nays: Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel, Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens and so, Amendment No. 3 failed. Amendment No. 4 was not offered. 2014-04-07 Senate Journal Page 2303 Senator Wielechowski offered Amendment No. 5 : Page 26, line 10: Delete "29,800,600" Insert "30,900,600" Delete "25,628,900" Insert "24,528,900" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Senator Wielechowski moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 5. Senator Kelly objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Ellis, French, Gardner, Wielechowski Nays: Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel, Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens and so, Amendment No. 5 failed. Senator Gardner offered Amendment No. 6 : Page 62, line 4: Delete "$100,000,000" Insert "$125,000,000" Senator Gardner moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 6. Senator Coghill objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2014-04-07 Senate Journal Page 2304 SCS CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 6 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Ellis, French, Gardner, Hoffman, Wielechowski Nays: Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens and so, Amendment No. 6 failed. Senator French offered Amendment No. 7 : Page 11, line 7: Delete "235,217,600" Insert "237,217,600" Delete "27,737,700" Insert "29,737,700" Page 11, line 28: Delete "2,000,000" Insert "4,000,000" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Senator French moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 7. Senator Coghill objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 7 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 7 YEAS: 6 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Ellis, French, Gardner, Hoffman, Olson, Wielechowski Nays: Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Stevens Absent: Stedman and so, Amendment No. 7 failed. 2014-04-07 Senate Journal Page 2305 Senator Wielechowski offered Amendment No. 8 : Page 14, line 12: Delete "26,711,600" Insert "25,626,900" Delete "13,666,200" Insert "12,581,500" Page 14, line 13: Delete "18,117,400" Insert "17,032,700" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Senator Wielechowski moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 8. Senator Kelly objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 8 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 8 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Ellis, French, Gardner, Wielechowski Nays: Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel, Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stevens Absent: Stedman and so, Amendment No. 8 failed. Senator French offered Amendment No. 9 : Page 36, line 5: Delete "117,727,400" Insert "116,051,700" Delete "113,386,100" Insert "111,710,400" 2014-04-07 Senate Journal Page 2306 Page 37, lines 7 - 8: Delete all material. Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Senator French moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 9. Senator Fairclough objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 9 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 9 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Ellis, French, Gardner, Olson Nays: Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel, Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Stedman, Stevens, Wielechowski and so, Amendment No. 9 failed. Senator Gardner offered Amendment No. 10 : Page 80, line 26, following "APPROPRIATIONS.": Insert "(a)" Page 80, following line 27: Insert a new subsection to read: "(b) The unexpended and unobligated balance of the appropriation made in sec. 1, ch. 16, SLA 2013, page 12, lines 20 - 25, lapses into the general fund on June 30, 2014." Senator Gardner moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 10. Senator Coghill objected. Senators Wielechowski, Ellis moved and asked unanimous consent to be shown as cosponsors on the amendment. Without objection, it was so ordered. 2014-04-07 Senate Journal Page 2307 Senator French called the Senate. The call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 10 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 10 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Ellis, French, Gardner, Wielechowski Nays: Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel, Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens and so, Amendment No. 10 failed. Senator Wielechowski offered Amendment No. 11 : Page 80, line 26, following "APPROPRIATIONS.": Insert "(a)" Page 80, following line 27: Insert a new subsection to read: "(b) $4,400,000 of the unexpended and unobligated balance of the appropriation made in sec. 1, ch. 16, SLA 2013, page 11, lines 17 - 19 (Anchorage, project 80's deferred and critical maintenance - $37,000,000) lapses into the general fund on June 30, 2014. It is the intent of the legislature that the Municipality of Anchorage not spend any of the money appropriated in sec. 1, ch. 16, SLA 2013, page 11, lines 17 - 19, for critical and deferred maintenance on the construction of new tennis courts." Senator Wielechowski moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 11. Objections were heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 11 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2014-04-07 Senate Journal Page 2308 SCS CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 11 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Ellis, French, Gardner, McGuire, Wielechowski Nays: Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel, Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens and so, Amendment No. 11 failed. Senator French offered Amendment No. 12 : Page 28, line 4: Delete "10,125,500" Insert "8,125,500" Delete "6,084,300" Insert "4,084,300" Page 28, line 8: Delete "4,062,600" Insert "2,062,600" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Senator French moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 12. Senator Fairclough objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 12 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 12 YEAS: 3 NAYS: 17 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Ellis, French, Gardner Nays: Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel, Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens, Wielechowski and so, Amendment No. 12 failed. 2014-04-07 Senate Journal Page 2309 Senator Wielechowski offered Amendment No. 13 : Page 42, line 12: Delete "35,057,400" Insert "32,393,691" Delete "35,001,400" Insert "32,337,691" Page 42, line 20: Delete "5,576,600" Insert "2,912,891" Page 42, following line 21: Insert "It is the intent of the legislature that Legislative Council take all reasonable measures to secure interim office space for the legislature in Anchorage that costs not more than the amount expended for fiscal year 2013, adjusted by a reasonable rate of inflation." Senator Wielechowski moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 13. Senator Kelly objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 13 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 13 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Ellis, French, Gardner, Wielechowski Nays: Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel, Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens and so, Amendment No. 13 failed. Senator French offered Amendment No. 14 : Page 7, line 6: Delete "5,995,100" in both places Insert "5,372,400" in both places 2014-04-07 Senate Journal Page 2310 Page 7, line 7: Delete "5,995,100" Insert "5,372,400" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Senator French moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 14. Senator Fairclough objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 14 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 14 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Ellis, French, Gardner, Wielechowski Nays: Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel, Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens and so, Amendment No. 14 failed. Senator Wielechowski offered Amendment No. 15 : Page 42, line 12: Delete "35,057,400" Insert "34,957,400" Delete "35,001,400" Insert "34,901,400" Page 42, line 20: Delete "5,576,600" Insert "5,476,600" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Senator Wielechowski moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 15. Senator Fairclough objected. 2014-04-07 Senate Journal Page 2311 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 15 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 15 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Ellis, French, Gardner, Hoffman, Wielechowski Nays: Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens and so, Amendment No. 15 failed. Senator Gardner offered Amendment No. 16 : Page 17, line 6: Delete "53,216,000" Insert "54,216,000" Delete "12,288,000" Insert "13,288,000" Page 17, line 11: Delete "5,664,300" Insert "6,664,300" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Senator Gardner moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 16. Senator Coghill objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 16 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 16 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Ellis, French, Gardner, Wielechowski 2014-04-07 Senate Journal Page 2312 Nays: Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel, Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens and so, Amendment No. 16 failed. Senator Wielechowski offered Amendment No. 17 : Page 17, line 6: Delete "53,216,000" Insert "53,716,000" Delete "12,288,000" Insert "12,788,000" Page 17, line 7: Delete "1,113,600" Insert "1,613,600" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Senator Wielechowski moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 17. Senator Coghill objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 17 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 17 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Ellis, French, Gardner, Wielechowski Nays: Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel, Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens and so, Amendment No. 17 failed. 2014-04-07 Senate Journal Page 2313 Senator Gardner offered Amendment No. 18 : Page 20, line 3: Delete "118,600,200" Insert "120,000,200" Delete "71,110,000" Insert "72,510,000" Page 20, line 18: Delete "12,291,700" Insert "13,691,700" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Senator Gardner moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 18. Senator Coghill objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 18 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 18 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Ellis, French, Gardner, Wielechowski Nays: Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel, Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens and so, Amendment No. 18 failed. Senator Wielechowski offered Amendment No. 19 : Page 29, line 31: Delete "17,179,400" Insert "17,429,400" Delete "10,286,500" Insert "10,536,500" 2014-04-07 Senate Journal Page 2314 Page 29, line 32: Delete "14,658,700" Insert "14,908,700" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Senator Wielechowski moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 19. Senator Fairclough objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 19 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 19 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Ellis, French, Gardner, Wielechowski Nays: Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel, Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens and so, Amendment No. 19 failed. Senator Gardner offered Amendment No. 20 : Page 32, line 7: Delete "19,162,600" Insert "19,792,600" Delete "12,315,600" Insert "12,945,600" Page 32, line 9: Delete "19,162,600" Insert "19,792,600" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Senator Gardner moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 20. Senator Coghill objected. 2014-04-07 Senate Journal Page 2315 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 20 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 20 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Ellis, French, Gardner, Hoffman, Wielechowski Nays: Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens and so, Amendment No. 20 failed. SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 266(FIN) was automatically in third reading. The question being: "Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 266(FIN) "An Act making appropriations for the operating and loan program expenses of state government and for certain programs, capitalizing funds, and making reappropriations; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 266(FIN) Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Dates YEAS: 16 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel, Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens Nays: Ellis, French, Gardner, Wielechowski and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 266(FIN) passed the Senate. Senator Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clauses. Without objection, it was so ordered. 2014-04-07 Senate Journal Page 2316 Senator Coghill gave notice of reconsideration and moved and asked unanimous consent that reconsideration be taken up at this time. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was before the Senate on reconsideration. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 266(FIN) "An Act making appropriations for the operating and loan program expenses of state government and for certain programs, capitalizing funds, and making reappropriations; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 266(FIN) Third Reading - On Reconsideration Effective Dates YEAS: 16 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel, Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens Nays: Ellis, French, Gardner, Wielechowski and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 266(FIN) passed the Senate on reconsideration. Senator Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clauses. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.